• SDVOSB Certification

    Posted on June 29 2012 by gjones in Testimonials with 0 comments


    Echelon Strategies receives official SDVOSB certification from the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Our official Department of VA Record: http://tinyurl.com/es-va-certification

  • On 26 June 2012, the Department of Veterans Affairs officially certified Echelon Strategies as a Service-Disabled, Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB). According to the certification, “Echelon Strategies LLC will be eligible to participate in Veterans First Contracting Program opportunities with the VA.” This is a great opportunity for Echelon to have the chance to give back to those who have given the most for us. We look forward to contributing to the success of the Department of Veterans Affairs in their efforts to take care of our Nation’s Warfighters.

    Our official page in the Dept of VA VIP Database: http://tinyurl.com/es-va-certification

  • It takes only a handful of tools to green a garden: a shovel, rake, hoe. Greening government requires a considerably greater array of gear. Public sector sustainability demands high-tech support in the form of alternative fuels, virtualized data centers, mobile technologies and sophisticated smart grids.

    In the face of budget crises, public pressure and emerging mandates, federal leaders are pressed to discover more planet-friendly solutions to their ongoing business needs. Agencies are making headway and more innovation is sure to come as technologies mature and new tools emerge.

  • Agencies must report on their progress in steering federal contracting set-asides to specific types of small businesses, according to new direction from Joe Jordan, the recently installed White House chief procurement officer.
    Joined by Small Business Administration chief Karen Mills, Jordan told agencies in a Wednesday memo to meet their statutory goal for contracting 23 percent with small businesses by considering the use of multiple award contracts with an eye toward “maximizing opportunities for small businesses when agencies make small dollar awards, and strengthening accountability for small business goal achievement.”

    The White House is following up on an April interagency working group meeting on compliance with a key section of the 2010 Small Business Jobs Act and a November 2011 addition to the federal acquisition regulation. The set-asides target small disadvantaged businesses, women-owned small businesses, service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses, and contractors in Historically Underutilized Business Zones.

    Under the memorandum, agencies are asked to use the threshold definition of a small business to consider requiring order set-asides under multiple award contracts if the agency is not currently meeting its small business goals. Procurement officers should review SBA’s proposed rule providing for consistent enforcement of policy on set-asides published in May in the Federal Register and make sure their acquisition workforce is trained in the topic.

    Agencies are required to document success stories and deliver results to the Office of Management and Budget by July 9.

    Jordan highlighted as a success story in a Thursday White House blog the Commerce Department’s use of a small contractor to lower its costs for desktops and laptops by 40 percent, saving an estimated $20 million to$25 million over the next five years. The arrangement eliminates hundreds of redundant contracts that meet the same requirements, avoiding “thousands of employee hours that would otherwise be required to maintain hundreds of narrowly tailored contracts,” he wrote.

    Meanwhile, the Obama administration’s methods for defining small businesses came under fire from the American Small Business League, which on Thursday sent the White House and SBA a letter demanding more accuracy in the annual report card on agency use of small businesses, the latest version of which is due out soon. The league objects to a methodology it says uses wrong numbers for the overall acquisition budget, ignores subcontracting, and counts too many awards to foreign contractors and unqualified Alaska native corporations for set-asides.

    The nonprofit Project on Government Oversight, which co-signed the league’s letter, also has reported that government exaggerates the number of small businesses under contract. “Seventy-two of the top 100 federal ‘small’ business contractors last year were actually large companies that snagged more than $16 billion in federal contracts,” POGO investigator Neil Gordon wrote.


    Article was written by By Charles S. Clark of GovExec.com; June 8, 2012

  • Obama authorizes DoD $662B

    Posted on January 3 2012 by gjones in Featured with 0 comments

    Click for details

    POLITICO: HONOLULU – President Barack Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act here Saturday, but not without expressing his objections to the funding bill’s provisions on the treatment of suspected terrorists, including U.S. citizens.

    The $662 billion bill, which the White House had initially threatened to veto, authorizes defense and counterterrorism spending through fiscal year 2012 and regulates the detention, interrogation and prosecution of suspected terrorists.

    It alarmed some officials at law enforcement agencies and civil liberties groups, who argued that the attempt to clarify executive power post-9/11 could constrain the president’s authority and curb the rights of Americans caught up in terror investigations.
    Obama expressed “serious reservations” about the bill but argued in a signing statement released Saturday that it does not fundamentally change executive power.

    The administration does not intend to interpret one provision as granting the military authority to detain Americans indefinitely, Obama said in the statement. It also opposes sections of the bill that block the transfer of detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to U.S. soil for any purpose and that restrict the government’s ability to transfer detainees to other countries.

    Despite these concerns, Obama said he has signed the bill because he approves of the vast majority of the language in its 500-plus pages, “chiefly because it authorizes funding for the defense of the United States and its interests abroad, crucial services for service members and their families, and vital national security programs that must be renewed.”

    The White House opposed the versions of the bill that passed the House and Senate, but this month officials said they found acceptable the version agreed to in conference committee between the two chambers.
    “We have concluded that the language does not challenge or constrain the president’s ability to collect intelligence, incapacitate dangerous terrorists and protect the American people,” the White House said then, announcing that his advisers would not encourage him to veto the bill.

    Still, Obama waited nearly two weeks — and came close to the Jan. 2 deadline he faced — before signing the legislation. The measures in the law on detainees take effect 60 days after it’s signed, and the administration used “the maximum amount of time to put these implementing procedures together,” a senior administration official said in a conference call with reporters.

    One section of the legislation has drawn the ire of civil liberties groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union, that say it allows for the indefinite detention of U.S. citizens.
    Obama said in the signing statement that his administration “will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens … doing so would break with our most important traditions and values as a nation.” Rather, the president said, the section reaffirms executive power that has been supported by the Supreme Court and lower courts.

    Some Republican lawmakers have said the bill does not alter the treatment of Americans.
    “Nothing here affects U.S. citizens,” Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-Texas) said this month. “The provisions in this bill … are small steps towards having this Congress back in detention decisions. I think it is the right small step.”

    But the ACLU is not satisfied, seeing Obama’s signature as a formalization of indefinite detainment. His action Saturday is “a blight on his legacy because he will forever be known as the president who signed indefinite detention without charge or trial into law,” the ACLU’s executive director, Anthony Romero, said in a statement. “Any hope that the Obama administration would roll back the constitutional excesses of George Bush in the war on terror was extinguished today.”

    In his signing statement, Obama also expressed opposition to “unwise funding restrictions” that extend Congress’s ban on bringing detainees at Guantanamo into the United States for any reason, which has been in place since 2009.

    The measure, he said, “intrudes upon critical executive branch authority to determine when and where to prosecute Guantanamo detainees, based on the facts and the circumstances of each case and our national security interest.” The administration also believes the section would, under some circumstances, violate constitutional separation of powers.
    Early in the Obama administration, Attorney General Eric Holder pushed hard for the trials of Guantanamo detainees in federal courts, since other alleged terrorists can face trial. But Holder backed down amid strong opposition and this year announced plans to try five men charged with plotting the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in a military court.
    The president said he opposes a section that contains “unwarranted” limits on the executive branch’s ability to transfer detainees to foreign countries because it “hinders the executive’s ability to carry out its military, national security and foreign relations activities.”

    Obama objected to a related provision, which requires that the attorney general consult with the director of national intelligence and the defense secretary before filing terror-related criminal charges or indicting certain people.
    He voiced concerns that other parts of the bill “could interfere with my constitutional foreign affairs power,” including one section that requires the president to submit a report to Congress 60 days before sharing classified ballistic missile defense information with Russia and that requires the report to include a detailed description of that classified information. While Obama intends to keep Congress informed, the statement said, he must do so “in a manner that does not interfere with the president’s constitutional authority to conduct foreign affairs and avoids the undue disclosure of sensitive diplomatic communications.”

    The bill also introduces new sanctions penalizing financial institutions that do business with Iran’s central bank, which is involved in oil transactions there. The sanctions don’t take effect for 180 days, giving the administration some time to determine how to implement them.

    Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has said the administration has concerns that the measure could undermine efforts to put international pressure on Iran and could potentially raise oil prices worldwide. The State Department has said it is looking for a way to impose the sanctions that would do maximum harm to Iran and minimal harm to the U.S. economy.

    By JENNIFER EPSTEIN | 12/31/11 4:02 PM EST Updated: 1/2/12 8:56 AM EST